检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈隆晖[1] 杨思进[1] 张勉[2] 李迪华 扶世杰[1] 黄卓燕[2] 孙永东[1] 胡文健[1] 姜玉良[1] 陈晓林[1] 张伟
机构地区:[1]泸州医学院附属中医医院耳鼻咽喉科 [2]广西中医学院第一附属医院耳鼻咽喉科 [3]四川省古蔺县中医院五官科
出 处:《中医杂志》2012年第13期1119-1122,共4页Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:国家中医药管理局中医药行业科研专项资助项目(2009ZL38)
摘 要:目的观察灼烧技术治疗慢性扁桃体炎的临床疗效,优化治疗方案。方法将慢性扁桃体炎患者随机分成治疗1组(10次结束疗程)49例与治疗2组(7次结束疗程)48例,采用灼烧技术进行治疗,治疗结束后观察两组治疗前后症状体征总积分变化、临床综合疗效及随访疗效。结果两组治疗前后症状和体征总积分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组治疗后积分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗1组临床综合疗效总有效率100%,治疗2组临床综合疗效总有效率95.9%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗1组随访疗效总有效率93.9%,治疗2组随访疗效总有效率95.8%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论灼烧技术疗效确切,治疗次数与治疗天数可以减少,操作简便。Objective To observe the therapeutic effect of the burning treatment on chronic tonsillitis and form a standard operation proposal. Methods The patients with chronic tonsillitis were randomized into two treatment groups, with 49 cases and 48 cases in group one and group two respectively. Group one was given 10 times of burning treatment and group two was given 7 times of burning treatment. The total integral, therapeutic effect and follow-up effect were observed and analyzed before and after the treatment in both groups. Results There were significant differences in the total integrals of symptoms and signs between before and after the treatment in both groups (P〈0.05), but the difference between groups was not significant (P〈0. 05). The comprehensive total effective rate of group one and group two was 100% and 95.9% respectively, and the follow-up total effective rate of both groups was 93.9% and 95.8% respectively. The difference between groups was not statistically significantly (P〉0.05). Conclusion The burning treatment for chronic tonsillitis is effective, simple and inexpensive, and the treatment times may be reduced.
分 类 号:R276.1[医药卫生—中医五官科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.254