检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南科技学院园艺园林学院,河南新乡453003
出 处:《西北林学院学报》2012年第4期238-241,共4页Journal of Northwest Forestry University
基 金:2010年河南省科技计划重点项目(102102310246)
摘 要:选取功能定位、空间结构与形态、生物多样性、交通与游览组织、建设和维护费用、景观艺术效果等6项指标,运用层次分析法(AHP)和逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)构建了植物园景观方案优选体系,并对25份植物园景观方案进行了实证评价以验证模型的可行性。结果表明:AHP和TOPSIS模型应用于植物园景观方案优选的区分度较好,能对植物园景观方案的综合质量进行较为全面、合理、准确地评价,是一种简便、有效的优选方法。该方法也适用于其他类型绿地的景观方案的优选。A optimization system was established for botanical garden landscape planning based on the com- bination models of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to i- deal solution (TOPSIS), in which 6 indices were adopted, functional orientation, spatial structure and form, biodiversity, transportation and tourism organization, cost of construction and maintenance, and landscape artistic effects. The model was verified by 25 botanical garden landscape plans. The results indi- cated that the distinctiveness was good when AHP--TOPSIS models were applied in the botanical garden landscape evaluation, and could make the landscape quality of botanical garden landscape plan more com- prehensive, reasonable, and accurate, which is a simple and effective assessment method. The method is also suitable for landscape works preference of other types of green spaces.
分 类 号:TU986[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28