“性灵说”的现代学术境遇  

On Modern Academic Study on the Theory of Xingling

作　　者：李勇[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学文学院,北京100875 [2]咸阳师范学院文学与传播学院,陕西咸阳712000

出　　处：《商洛学院学报》2012年第3期24-29,共6页Journal of Shangluo University

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(08JJD751070);咸阳师范学院专项科研基金项目(06XSYK225)

摘　　要：作为中国古典文学的三大诗学理论之一,"性灵说"在现代学术语境中受到了特别的关注。将从中日学术史的宏观视野出发,对"性灵说"的现代学术境遇展开深入的比较与分析。在20世纪20、30年代的《中国文艺理论批评史》著作中,赞同"性灵说"的声音明显要高亢于否定的声音。究其原因,"性灵说"所潜含的诗学理念与人性解放观念与"五.四"新文化精神是契合的,便自然而然地成为了支撑新文化运动与新文学革命的文化资源。As one of the three poetic theories of Chinese classic literature, the theory of Xingling received special attention in modem academic study. In the perspective of the Chinese and Japanese academic history, the modem academic study on the theory of Xingling is deeply compared and analysed. In works of History of Chinese Artistic Theory Criticism published in 1920s and 1930s, there were more support than negation. The reason lies in the fact that the poetic theory and the human emancipation implicated in the theory of Xingling went with the spirit if May Fourth New Cultural Movement, and naturally, became the cultural source supporting the New Cultural Movement and the New Literature Revolution.

关 键 词：性灵说 新文化运动 文学革命 海外汉学 

分 类 号：I206.09[文学—中国文学]