检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗晓霞[1]
机构地区:[1]湖南农业大学,湖南长沙410128
出 处:《行政与法》2012年第6期113-116,共4页Administration and Law
基 金:2011年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"竞争政策视野下商标法理论研究--关系;协调及制度构建"的阶段性成果;项目编号:11YJA820048
摘 要:由于技术秘密权利边界的模糊性和内容的广泛性,现实中有人随意地将一些不属于技术秘密的技术信息纳入技术秘密的范畴请求保护。由此,法院在审理技术秘密的案件中,有必要分清受保护的技术秘密和不受保护的公知技术,将技术秘密留给权利人,将公知技术留给社会公众。在这种平衡过程中,合理确定技术秘密的范围是审理的关键。Because of the right boundary ambiguity and wide range content in technical secret,in reality,people casually put some technology information that do not belong to technical secret into technical secret category for protection.Thus,in technology secret cases,it is necessary for court to distinguish between the protected technology secret and not protected known technology ,then leave the technical secret to the right holder and provide the known technology to the public.During the course of the operation of this balance,reasonably determining the range of the technical secret is the trial key. The plaintiff's technology information,which is known technology,which is the technical secret?How to identify known technology's reference standard? How to grasp the line of technology secret and known technology?Analysis and judgment of these problems need to be combined with cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44