飞行人员纯音听阈测定结果分析  

Pure Tone Audiometric Test Results of Aircrew

作　　者：薛迎春 薛烽 杨秀秀 施斌斌 

机构地区：[1]解放军454医院耳鼻喉科,江苏南京210002 [2]解放军454医院空勤科,江苏南京210002

出　　处：《华南国防医学杂志》2012年第3期247-249,共3页Military Medical Journal of South China

基　　金：南京军区医药卫生科研基金课题(10MA050)

摘　　要：目的探讨飞机噪声对飞行人员听力的影响。方法以208名不同机种飞行人员为研究对象,分为歼(强)击机组(A组),运(轰)机组(B组),民航组(C组),以同一年龄段的非噪声接触人群41人为对照组(D组),进行飞机噪声测定及纯音听阈测定,进行统计学分析。结果 A、B、C3组飞行人员言语频率平均听阈及高频平均听阈与D组相比均显著下降(P<0.01或0.05),A组言语频率平均听阈及高频平均听阈与B,C两组间比较有统计学差异(P<0.01,P<0.05),B组与C组间比较无统计学差异。结论不同机种的噪声对飞行人员听力存在不同程度的影响。噪声性耳聋的预防重点在于加强航卫保障质量,提高个人防护意识及定期进行听力检查。Objective To explore the effect of fight noise on hearing loss of aircrew.Methods A total of 208 aircrew of different airplane types were divided into group A（fighter/attacker crew）,group B（bomber/carrier crew）,and group C（civilian fighter crew）.Control group D contained 41 people in the same age range without noise contact.The fight noise was detected,the pure tone audiometry was tested,and the data was statistically analyzed.Results The average threshold of speech frequency of group A,B and C were significantly decreased compared with that of group D（P0.01 or 0.05）.The average threshold of speech frequency and high frequency threshold of group A were significantly different compared with group B or C（P0.01 or 0.05）.There was no statistical difference between group B and group C.Conclusion The noise of different types of planes have different degrees of effects on hearing of the aircrew.The prevention of noise induced deafness should focus on improving the avaiation medical service quality,raising awareness,strengthening personal protection and carrying out regular hearing testing.

关 键 词：飞行人员 噪声性听力损害 听力检查 

分 类 号：R852.4[医药卫生—航空、航天与航海医学]