检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国实用眼科杂志》2012年第7期856-857,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology
摘 要:目的对比分析爱必肤与传统缝合方法处理眼睑外伤的治疗效果。方法91例伤口整齐清洁的眼睑外伤患者根据患者意愿分成A、B两组,A组43例选择行人体组织粘合剂黏合创口法,B组48例选择传统丝线间断缝合法,观察并比较手术疼痛率,创口愈合情况及术后瘢痕情况。结果手术疼痛率及瘢痕程度方面A组与B组差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),两组所有创口均一期愈合。结论使用爱必肤处理眼睑外伤具有方便,高效,减少瘢痕等许多优点,值得眼科临床广泛推广。Objective To study the therapeutic effect of skin adhesive-EPLIGLU and traditional suture in emergency treatment of eyelid. Methods Ninety-one cases of regular eyelid wound were randomly divided into two groups, group A (43 cases) was performed with the skin adhesive-EPLIG- LU, group B (48 cases) was done with traditional interrupted suture. The difference of ache percent- age, the condition of wound healing and dermal scarring was studied. Results Compared with con- trol group B, group A had statistically significant difference in the ache percentage and dermal scar- ring (P 〈0.05). All cases were grade healing. Conclusion Skin adhesive-EPLIGLU has many advan- tages over the traditional method in the treatment of eyelid injury, deserving generally clinical appli- cation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33