检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赖菁[1] 淦伟强[1] 谢冬英[1] 张卡[1] 柯伟民[1] 高志良[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第三医院感染病科,广州510630
出 处:《中华肝脏病杂志》2012年第7期522-525,共4页Chinese Journal of Hepatology
摘 要:目的探讨不同HBeAg状态慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者临终前HBV DNA载量的动态变化及其临床意义。方法回顾陛分析107例ACLF患者临终前29~56d、15~28d和0~14d血清HBeAg、抗-HBe和HBV DNA载量,比较不同HBeAg状态和时间段患者的HBV DNA载量差异。两组间均数比较采用t检验,多组均数之间比较采用ONE-WAY ANOVA分析。结果HBeAg(+)患者37例,上述3个时间段HBV DNA载量依次为(6.11±1.63)、(5.61±1.50)、(5.29±1.96)log10拷贝/ml;70例抗-HBe(+)患者顺次为(4.63±1.82)、(5.81±1.78)、(4.93±1.73)log10拷贝/ml。HBeAg(+)组与抗。HBe(+)组相同时间段比较,HBV DNA载量在临终前29~56d差异有统计学意义(t=2.606,P=0.015,P〈0.05),但临终前15~28d和0~14d的差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。同组内三个时段HBV DNA载量的两两比较,HBeAg(+)组差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05);抗-HBe(+)组在临终前29~56d与15~28d或0~14d的差异也无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但临终前15~28d和0~14d的差异有统计学意义(P=0.026,P〈0.05)。结论在致死性ACLF的启动,HBeAg(+)患者HBV DNA水平高于抗-HBe(+)者。随着肝衰竭恶化,HBeAg(+)患者HBV DNA载量维持一定水平,而抗-HBe(+)患者HBV DNA载量在终末期呈下降状态。Objective To investigate the dynamics and clinical significance of serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels during the terminal phase of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) with different hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status. Methods en patients with terminal ACLF were tested for HBeAg status by electrochemiluminescence irnmunoassay and serum HBV DNA levels by real-time PCR at three chronological time ranges, representing increasing severity of disease phases prior to death (day 0): 29-56 d, 15-28 d, and 0-14 d. Results In the 37 HBeAg(+) patients, HBV DNA levels at above-mentioned phases were 6.10± 1.63, 5.61 ± 1.50, and 5.29± 1.96 log10 copies/mL. In the 70 anti-HBe(+) patients, HBV DNA levels were 4.63 ± 1.82, 5.81 ± 1.78, and 4.93 ± 1.73 log10 copies/mL. Phase to phase comparisons revealed that the HBV DNA level in the HBeAg(+) group was significantly higher than that in the anti-HBe(+) group at 29-56 d (P〈0.05), and that 15-28 d and 0-14 d were not significantly different (P〉0.05). Intragroup comparisons of phases revealed no significant differences in the HBeAg(+) group (P〉 0.05), but a significant difference between 15-28 d and 0-14 d (P〈0.05) for the anti-HBe(+) group. Conclusion Serum levels of HBV DNA in patients with HBeAg positivity are higher than those in patients with anti-HBe positivity as the disease phase of ACLF nears fatality. Following the deterioration to liver failure, the HBV DNA load in HBeAg(+) patients remains stable while that in anti-HBe(+) patients decreases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117