检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何志炜[1]
出 处:《中国现代医药杂志》2012年第6期37-39,共3页Modern Medicine Journal of China
摘 要:目的探讨小儿反复呼吸道感染(RRTI)的发病机制。方法选择我科被诊断为反复呼吸道感染的患儿35例,另选正常35例儿童为对照组,检测血清IgG、IgA、IgM及IgG亚类水平;检测CD分子的表达。结果 RRTI组患儿的血清IgG、IgA水平与对照组比较差异无统计学意义,IgM水平低于对照组,RRTI组患儿的血清IgG2和IgG4水平均低于对照组,IgG1、IgG3水平差异无显著性。35例RRTI患儿中IgG亚类缺陷共17例,检出率为48.6%(17/35)。RRTI组患儿的CD3、CD4分子表达水平较对照组明显降低,CD8、CD4/CD8、CD19、CD16+56等表达两组比较无差异。结论 IgG亚类能够比较敏感地反映反复呼吸道感染患儿的体液免疫功能,IgG亚类缺陷的患儿多伴有不同程度的T细胞功能障碍,因此在临床工作中应注意监测患儿血清IgG亚类及各项细胞免疫功能。Objective To discuss the pathogenesis of children with repeated respiratory tract infection. Methods Selected 35 children with repeated respiratory tract infection ,another 35 normal children in control group .Detected serum IgG, I- gA in them, IgM and IgG subclass levels and expression of CD molecules. Results There was no significant difference between RRTI group and control group with serum IgG and IgA level, but the level of IgM in RRTI group was lower than that of control group, the serum IgG2 and IgG4 was lower than the control group, there was no difference between RRTI group and control group with IgGl,IgG3. 17 cases in RRTI group with IgG subclass deficiencies, the detection rate was 48.6%(17/35).The level of CD3 ,CD4 expression was lower than the control group. There were no difference between the two groups with CD8 ,CD4/ CD8,CD19,CD16+56 expression. Conclusion IgG subclasses can reflect repeated respiratory tract infection children's humoral immune function, IgG subclass deficiencies is often accompanied by T cell dysfunction ,therefore, monitoring of serum IgG subclass function and the cellular immune function should be done.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15