检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学第二临床学院妇产科,沈阳110003
出 处:《中国实用妇科与产科杂志》2000年第5期291-292,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics
摘 要:目的 评价新式剖宫产术式的优点。方法 分析 382例新式剖宫产产妇术中、术后情况 ,并与同期腹膜外剖宫产及子宫下段剖宫产比较 ,观察手术时间、出血量、娩头难易、术后进食时间及排气时间等。结果 新式剖宫产较腹膜外剖宫产从开腹到娩胎儿时间平均缩短 10 1min(P <0 0 1) ,出血量平均减少 2 8ml(P <0 0 5 ) ,且娩胎头容易 ;较子宫下段剖宫产手术时间平均缩短 12min(P <0 0 1) ,术后进食平均早 11 9h(P <0 0 1) ,术后排气平均早 15 5h(P <0 0 1)。对膀胱无干预 ,术后均无血尿及排尿困难发生。Objective To evaluate the prominent merit of new mode cesarean section(CS).Methods The duration of operation, bleeding volume, difficulties of taking out fetal head, the postoperative period of taking food and breaking wind were analyzed in 382 cases of new mode cesarean section, and compared with those in extraperitoneal CS and uterine lower segmental CS.Results Compared with extraperitoneal CS, the new mode had the following merits: the duration between the skin incision and getting the fetus out was 10 1 min shorter (P<0 01),bleeding volume 28ml less than that of extraperitoneal CS in average, and it was easier to get the fetal head out. Compared with the uterine lower segmental CS, the duration of operation was 12min shorter; the period between operation to taking food was 11 9h earlier (P<0 01) and to breaking wind was 15 5h earlier. In addition, there was no stimulation to the bladder, and no hematuria or disuria after operation .Conclusion The new mode cesarean section can be universally used in clinic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.173.228