检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈晨凌[1] 向明亮[1] 吴皓[1] 王振涛 陈立 程岚[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,上海交通大学医学院耳科学研究所,上海200092
出 处:《中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志》2012年第3期189-193,共5页Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-skull Base Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨甲状腺手术中常规解剖喉返神经对防止其损伤的临床价值。方法回顾性分析5344例甲状腺手术患者在全身麻醉下行手术治疗的临床资料,术中解剖喉返神经548例(解剖组),未解剖喉返神经4796例(未解剖组);比较两组术中喉返神经损伤的发生率有无差异。结果解剖组喉返神经损伤12例,发生率为2.2%;未解剖组喉返神经损伤512例,发生率为10.7%。两组喉返神经损伤率差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论甲状腺手术中常规解剖喉返神经能有效防止其损伤。Objective To explore the value of dissecting the recurrent 1aryngeal nerve(RLN) in thyroid surgery to prevent RLN from injury.Methods Clinical data of 5344 cases of thyroidectomy under general anesthesia was analyzed retrospectively.Among these cases,548 underwent dissection of the RLN(RLN dissecting group),and 4796 did not(non-RLN dissecting group).The difference of the RLN injury rates between the two groups was analyzed.Results RLN injury occurred in 12 cases of the RLN dissecting group(RLN injury rate =2.2%) and in 512 cases of the non-RLN dissecting group(injury rate=10.7%).The difference of RLN injury rates between the two groups was statistically significant(P0.01).Conclusion Dissecting RLN in the thyroid surgery is an effective step to prevent the nerve from injury.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249