检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]珠海市人民医院,519000
出 处:《当代医学》2012年第20期30-31,共2页Contemporary Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨门诊行经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性。方法将200例行PCI治疗的冠心病患者随机分为门诊组和住院组。两组均给予经桡动脉PCI治疗。结果两组患者均无严重并发症和死亡病例。住院组PCI成功率稍高于对照组,术后并发症发生率稍低于对照组,但均无显著性差异(均P>0.05)。住院组治疗费用显著高于门诊组(P<0.01)。结论门诊PCI治疗可在保证有效性和安全性的同时显著降低医疗费用,值得临床考虑。Objective To explore the feasibility about percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) by transradial approach in outpatient service.Methods 200 cases of patients with coronary heart disease that needed to therapy of PCI were randomly divided into outpatient service group and hospital group.Both groups were given therapy of PCI by transradial approach.Results The PCI successful rate in hospital group were little higher than that in outpatient service group,and complications rate were little lower than that in outpatient service group,but no significant difference(all P〉0.05).The therapy cost in hospital group was significantly higher than that in outpatient service group(P〈0.01).Conclusion PCI in outpatient service can ensure the safety and efficiency,and significantly decrease the therapy cost,so it deserved considering in clinical work.
分 类 号:R541.4[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.182