B超引导与CT引导腹腔盆腔囊肿及脓肿经皮穿刺抽吸治疗的比较  

Comparison of ultrasound- and CT-guided percutaneous drainage of abdominal and pelvic cyst and abscess

作　　者：叶丽河 沈薏 古杰洪[3] 黄玉莲[2] 

机构地区：[1]深圳市龙岗区布吉街道计生服务中心B超室,广东518112 [2]深圳市第八人民医院超声科,广东518101 [3]广州市第一人民医院放射科,广州510180

出　　处：《影像诊断与介入放射学》2012年第3期219-221,共3页Diagnostic Imaging & Interventional Radiology

摘　　要：目的探讨比较B超引导与CT引导腹腔盆腔囊肿及脓肿经皮穿刺抽吸治疗的作用。方法 B超引导下腹腔盆腔囊肿及脓肿经皮穿刺抽吸治疗56例患者,CT引导下45例患者。结果 B超引导下共穿刺58个囊肿或脓肿,穿刺次数63次;CT引导下共穿刺45个囊肿或脓肿,穿刺次数77次。B超引导下行腹腔盆腔囊肿及脓肿经皮穿刺抽吸治疗每个囊肿或脓肿平均穿刺次数显著少于CT引导。结论腹腔盆腔囊肿及脓肿经皮穿刺抽吸治疗术中,B超引导较CT引导具有更多的优势。Objective To compare the efficacy between ultrasound- and CT-guided percutaneous drainage of abdominal and pelvic cyst and abscess. Methods The puncture frequency of uhrasound-guided （56 patients） and CT-guided （45 patients） percutaneous drainage of abdominal/pelvic cysts and abscesses was compared. Results Sixty- three punctures were made using ultrasound-guided drainage of 58 cysts or abscesses in 56 patients. Seventy-seven punctures were made using CT-guided drainage of 45 cysts or abscesses in 45 patients. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage is more effective and safer than CT-guided drainage of abdominal/pelvic cysts and abscesses.

关 键 词：B超引导 CT引导 腹腔 盆腔 囊肿 脓肿 穿刺抽吸 

分 类 号：R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R816.5[医药卫生—诊断学]