检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵葆珉[1]
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学外国语学院
出 处:《阿拉伯世界研究》2012年第4期73-86,共14页Arab World Studies
基 金:西安交通大学"中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助"项目"回归欧亚大陆--中国大战略转型"的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:中美在亚太地区战略利益存在一定的结构性矛盾,但双方的安全竞争具有低烈度性,处于可控范围内;在中东地区,中美战略利益存在结构上的互补性,双方在防扩散、反恐、反海盗、维护自由通航、确保能源供应安全、维护海湾等中东国家的局势稳定等方面,尽管存在分歧,但拥有共同利益和认知。中东既是美国全球霸权的三大战略地区之一,也是中国"大周边外交"的组成部分,是中国运筹大国关系的支点和平台。未来中美在中东的战略协作将继续在结构性互补的框架下展开。双方需要以开展中东热点外交为抓手,拓展中美在中东战略利益的兼容性,使全球视野下的中美战略合作拥有更加稳定的平台。In the twenty years of the so-called tmi-polar period, under the nuclear equilibrium, Sino-US competition is characterized by manifest strategic compatibility. The United States contents itself with political and military supremacy, while China focuses on economic expansion. Through the twenty years of peaceful economic development, China has ridden itself of the risky situation of imminent military pressure, and enters into a new phase in its peaceful rise. Overseas interest is now part of china's national interest. China is contiguous to Middle East by land and sea, while for the United States, hegemonic power in the region is one of the pillars of its global dominance. The Sino-US strategic competition in the region should continue the mode of strategic compatibility in the past 20 years. The transfer of power will be conducted smoothly as what is going on the global level up to now.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229