检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王文涛[1,2] 上官文斌[1,3] 段小成[1,3]
机构地区:[1]华南理工大学机械与汽车工程学院,广州510640 [2]广州城市职业学院机电工程系,广州510405 [3]宁波拓普集团股份有限公司,宁波315800
出 处:《汽车工程》2012年第6期544-550,539,共8页Automotive Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(50975091)资助
摘 要:通过对某橡胶材料标准试件的单轴拉伸、平面拉伸和等双轴拉伸的应力-应变数据的测试,并利用最小二乘原理识别了5种常见橡胶超弹性本构模型的参数,对比了不同模型间的拟合精度。以某款车型的橡胶隔振器为实例,计算不同本构模型在3种典型工程应变下的力-位移曲线,并与实测数据进行对比。结果表明,Mooney-Rivlin模型在处理较小应变数据时具有较好的计算精度和计算稳定性,Van der Waals模型和3阶Ogden模型在处理较大应变数据时具有较好的计算精度。The stress-strain data in uniaxial, planar and biaxial tension tests of standard rubber specimen are measured, based on which the parameters of 5 common hyperelastic constitutive models are identified with least square principle, and the fitting accuracies of different models are compared. Then taking the rubber isolator of a re- al vehicle as an example, its force-displacement curves under three typical engineering strains with different consti- tutive models are calculated and compared with measured data. The results show that in dealing with smaller strain values, Mooney-Rivlin model has the highest accuracy and computational stability among all the models, while in dealing with large strain values, Van der Waals model and Ogden3 model have better accuracies than other models.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.237.31