网络经济视角下滥用市场支配地位行为的法律规制——兼评“360与QQ事件”  

A Study on Legal Regulations of Misuse of Dominant Market Position in the Context of Net Economy——With Comments on the Friction Between 360 and Tencent

作　　者：许延东[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法律硕士学院,重庆渝北区401120

出　　处：《西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第4期57-64,共8页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：2010年度中国法学会部级研究课题"技术标准化的反垄断法规制研究"(CLS-D1067)

摘　　要：网络经济有别于过去的经济形态,使得竞争市场出现了:高固定成本投入和低边际成本、显著的网络效应与锁定规律和急速的科技创新与动态的竞争市场等特征。这些变化使得产生并发展于工业经济的反垄断法如何规制网络经济条件下的滥用市场支配地位行为成为疑问,"360与QQ事件"的出现恰好成为此问题的试金石。针对网络经济,传统的反垄断法制度及其基础理论仍然有效,但为适应社会的发展,在传统制度及其理论基础上,应创新反垄断法微观制度规则,在现有制度体系中构建有活力、有针对性的反垄断法律制度,以达到有效规制网络经济中滥用市场支配地位等诸多不法行为的目的。The Internet economy distinguishes itself from other economic forms, adding new characteristics to market competition： high fixed cost with low marginal cost, obvious network effects and lock-in principles, rapid technological innovation and dynamic competition, etc. These changes are posing questions as to how the anti-monopoly regulations originating from traditional industrial economy could contain the misuse of monopoly power in the context of internet economy. The friction between 360 and Tencent happened to be the right test stone. Through analyzing monopoly power misuse, explaining the uniqueness of internet economy, and inspecting the 360 versus Tencent issue, this article aims to answer the questions of how law enforcement departments should handle similar cases, and how anti-monopoly law could prevent market power misuse on the macroeconomic level in the new situation.

关 键 词：网络经济 网络效应 “360与QQ事件” 滥用市场支配地位 反垄断法 

分 类 号：DF414[政治法律—经济法学]