检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《现代临床医学》2012年第2期90-91,共2页Journal of Modern Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察全身麻醉联合单次骶管神经阻滞在小儿下腹部手术中的效果。方法:50例4~9岁择期行下腹部手术的患儿,随机分成全麻组和联合组2组。观察2组患者一般生命体征,丙泊酚、雷米芬太尼每小时用量,麻醉效果、并发症及麻醉方式改变等情况。结果:全麻组的平均动脉压(MAQ)和心率(HR)在术中(T1)、停药后5分钟(T2)、苏醒时(T3)均高于联合组(P<0.05),丙泊酚、雷米芬太尼每小时用量联合组明显少于全麻组(P<0.01)。2组患儿在诱导合作、术中体动、苏醒期躁动、苏醒时间、麻醉方式改变等方面有差异但差异无统计学上的意义。结论:全麻联合单次骶管阻滞在小儿下腹部手术中可以提供满意的麻醉效果。Objective : To observe the effects and safety of general anesthesia with single block caudal during lower abdominal surgery in children, nethods:ifty children undergoing lower abdominal surgery were divided into general anesthesia group and uniting group. The BP, HR and SpO2 were continually monitored. The every hour usage of propofol and remifentanil , blockade and side effects were recorded. Results:The MAP and HR in general anesthesia group were higher than those in uniting group at during operation( T1 ), 5 minutes after stopping propofol (T2), in waking state (T3). The every hour usage of propofol and remifentanil were lower in uniting group than that in general anesthesia group. Conclusion : general anesthesia with single block caudal during lower abdominal surgery in children is effective and safe.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222