检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑世存[1] 栾永福[2] 罗栋[3] 朱兰兰[2] 谢元璋[4] 孙蓉[1]
机构地区:[1]山东省中医药研究院,山东济南250014 [2]天津中医药大学,天津300193 [3]山东中医药大学,山东济南250355 [4]哈尔滨商业大学,黑龙江哈尔滨150076
出 处:《中国药物警戒》2012年第7期387-391,共5页Chinese Journal of Pharmacovigilance
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)中医基础理论专项资助项目课题2(2009CB522802)
摘 要:目的研究鸦胆子不同组分发挥抗炎作用的治疗指数和安全范围。方法通过建立巴豆致小鼠耳肿胀模型和琼脂致小鼠肉芽肿胀模型探究鸦胆子不同组分抗急、慢性炎症作用,并进行鸦胆子不同组分急性致死量实验。计算各组分发挥抗炎药效的ED50和急性毒性试验的LD50和LD5,求得不同组分发挥抗炎作用的治疗指数(TI),安全系数(SF)。结果鸦胆子不同组分对炎症模型有明显的抗炎作用,并呈现一定的量效关系,且水提组分抗炎作用大于醇提组分。鸦胆子水提、醇提组分对耳肿胀模型小鼠的抗炎TI、SF分别为35.6207、7.8040和25.3285、3.6645;鸦胆子水提、醇提组分对肉芽肿模型小鼠的抗炎TI、SF分别为47.6659、7.5494和32.6431、4.2959。结论鸦胆子醇提组分发挥抗炎作用的安全范围大于水提组分,在应用鸦胆子水提组分时更应密切注意不良反应的发生并加强用药监测。Objective To research therapeutic index(TI) and the margin of safety factor(SF) of anti-inflammatory effect of Fructus Bruceae. Methods Establish tumidness model induced by daubing croton oil and granuloma model induced by subcutaneous injection of agar to explore acute and chronic anti-inflammatory effect of different components from Fructus Bruceae, and acute lethal dose test is also proceeded. Calculate ED50 and ED9s of anti-inflammatory efficacy and LDs0 and LDs of acute toxicity test of the different components from Fructus Bruceae. And then calculate the therapeutic index(TI) and safety factor(SF) of different components from Fructus Bruceae. Results The different components from Fructus Bruceae showed good anti-inflammatory effect and certain dose-effect relationship. The anti-inflammatory effect of alcohol extraction component was better than it of water extraction component. TI of anti-acute inflammatory effect of the water extraction component and the alcohol extraction component from Fructus Bruceae is 35.6207 and 25.3285, and SF is 7.8040 and 3.6645 respectively. And TI of anti-chronic inflammatory effect of the water extracts and the alcohol extracts from Fructus Bruceae is 47.6659 and 32.6431, and SF is 7.5494 and 4.2959 respectively. Conclusion The anti-inflammatory effect of the water extracts is greater than the alcohol extracts from Fructus Bruceae, but the margin of safety from alcohol extracts is greater than the water extracts from Fructus Bruceae. We should pay more attention to the occurrence of adverse reactions and strengthen drug moni- toringin in the application of the water extracts from Fructus Bruceae.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222