检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:俞志强[1] 魏海涛[2] 李连华[1] 万凡兵[1]
机构地区:[1]空军预警学院二系,武汉430019 [2]空军预警学院四系,武汉430019
出 处:《空军雷达学院学报》2012年第3期221-223,共3页Journal of Air Force Radar Academy
摘 要:为了全面地评估装备课堂教学质量,根据装备课堂教学的特点,构建了装备课堂教学质量评估体系,运用层次分析法(AHP)确定各指标的权重系数,采用模糊综合评判法(FCE)进行综合评定,得到装备课堂教学综合评价及综合评价排名.实例分析表明,基于AHP-FCE评估的结果更加客观,能够综合反映每名教员的真实教学水平和装备课堂的教学质量.这为提高装备课程教学质量提供了参考.To comprehensively assess the teaching quality of equipment class, this paper establishes assessment system on teaching quality of equipment class, in accordance with its features, sets the weighting coefficients for each index using the method of AHP, makes an overall evaluation using the method of FCE, and finally obtain the comprehensive assessment on equipment class teaching and its ranking. By example analysis, it is shown that the assessment results based on AHP-FCE are of more objectives, and reflect comprehensively every instructor' s true levels of teaching and teaching quality of equipment class, which can be a reference for improving teaching quality of equipment curriculum.
关 键 词:装备课堂教学 质量评估 层次分析法 模糊综合评判法
分 类 号:N945.16[自然科学总论—系统科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31