检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭石[1] 李敬府[1] 白志勇[1] 崔秋菊[2] 毛驰[2] 张雷[2]
机构地区:[1]北京大学第三医院超声科,北京100191 [2]北京大学口腔医学院口腔颌面外科,北京100081
出 处:《中国临床医学影像杂志》2012年第7期488-491,共4页Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
摘 要:目的:探讨彩色多普勒血流显像在腓肠内侧动脉穿支血管检查中的应用。方法:以术中所见为标准,采用单盲的方法比较手持式声学多普勒及彩色多普勒血流显像对腓肠内侧动脉穿支数目、位置、血管直径检查及判断血管走行中的价值。结果:本研究移植8例皮瓣,共计24支穿支动脉,彩色多普勒血流显像与声学多普勒超声分别确诊22支及17支,误诊为2支和6支,漏诊为2支和7支,二者有显著统计学差异(P<0.05)。彩色多普勒血流显像测量血管直径与术中测量无统计学差异(P>0.05)。穿支血管主干分叉点16处,彩色多普勒血流显像与术中所见一致,二者吻合率为100%。8例皮瓣存活良好,术后未出现明显并发症。结论:彩色多普勒血流显像对腓肠内侧动脉穿支血管检测和皮瓣设计方面具有重要价值,能够提高皮瓣移植的可靠性。Objective: To evaluate the application of color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) in the medial sural artery perfora- tor(MSAP) flap. Methods: CDFI and acoustic Doppler ultrasound were compared in evaluating the number, location, diameter of perforator and main vascular traveling by single-blind trials, the data were compared with intraoperative anatomical finding. Results: In this study eight flaps were transplanted, 24 perforating arteries were involved. Totally 22 MSAPs were found by preoperative CDFI, and 17 by acoustic Doppler ultrasound, 2 and 6 perforators were misdiagnosed respectively, 2 and 7 were missed respectively. There were significant statistical differences between these two methods (P〈0.05). The measurement of di- ameter by CDFI have no significant statistical difference with the finding in operation(P〉0.05), and 16 vascular bifurcation de- tected by CDFI was accordance with that found in intraoperative anatomy. Flap survived well with no significant postoperative complications in 8 cases. Conclusion: CDFI is very useful for preoperative planning of medial sural artery perforator flap and increase the reliability of the perforator flap.
分 类 号:R543.5[医药卫生—心血管疾病] R445.1[医药卫生—内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145