平衡中国劳动力市场的灵活安全性——理论指标、实证研究及政策选择  

Balance Flexibility and Security of the Labor Market in China: Theoretical Indicators,Empirical Study and Policy Implications

作　　者：张原[1] 沈琴琴[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国劳动关系学院

出　　处：《经济评论》2012年第4期53-67,共15页Economic Review

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"平衡中国劳动力市场灵活性与稳定性的模式研究"(项目批准号:10BJY029)资助

摘　　要：平衡中国劳动力市场的灵活性和安全性是保障就业水平、劳动者权益和企业绩效的重要选择,本文在综述相关文献的基础上构建研究中国劳动力市场灵活安全性的理论模型和指标体系,并实证分析灵活安全性与宏观、微观绩效之间的相关性。研究发现,中国劳动力市场存在局部灵活性偏高和安全性不足的现象,并且体制内外、产业、地区和不同劳动力群体之间的差异较大,灵活安全性与绩效之间的回归分析和相关性分析表明,中国劳动力市场的实际状况与"劳动力市场灵活安全性交易曲线模型"所描述的情况基本相符,但同时也存在政策含义较复杂的非代偿关系。对此,平衡中国劳动力市场灵活安全性的政策选择需要协调劳资双方绩效目标和宏观经济目标之间的关系,同时权衡灵活安全性政策本身带来的不同绩效之间的相互矛盾或抵消作用。Balancing the labor market＇ s flexibility and security is important to the protection of employment, labor rights and enterprise performance. We built a theoretical model and an index system to study China＇ s labor market basing on the review of the literatures, and did a serious of empirical analysis of the correlation between flexicurity and the macro and micro performance of the labor market. China＇ s labor market is partly highly flexible and partly unsecure, and there are large gaps between different ownerships, industries, regions and labor groups. The regression and correlation analysis of flexieurity and performance show that the actual situation of China＇ s labor market is similar to the analysis of transactions curve model of flexibility and security, but there＇ re also some non - compensatory relationships which lead to complex policy implications. For the balance of China labor market＇ s flexibility and security, we need to coordinate the relationship between employers and employees＇ performance objectives and macroeconomic objectives, and consider the trade - offs and conflict between different performance by flexicurity policy itself.

关 键 词：灵活性 安全性 劳动力市场灵活安全性 劳动力市场制度 

分 类 号：F249.2[经济管理—劳动经济] F224[经济管理—国民经济]