检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《西安体育学院学报》2012年第4期397-402,共6页Journal of Xi'an Physical Education University
基 金:广东省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划青年项目(GD10YTY02)
摘 要:体育法的价值冲突主要包括各价值目标间的冲突、不同价值主体的相互对立以及不同体育法律制度的价值冲突,具体表现在立法、执法、守法过程中自由和秩序、公平和自由、秩序和公平等价值目标间的冲突。造成体育法价值冲突的原因多种多样,其中主体的多元性、认识论中二元对立的机械思维模式、价值论中的一元性与多元性的对立和社会结构各领域对于体育法的需求不同等是主要原因。体育法价值冲突的解决是体育法的价值得以实现的需要,也是体育法不断革新和发展的需要,因此必须在坚持以人为本、相对位阶和多元适用的原则下,解决体育法的价值冲突。The conflict of value of sports law covers mainly the conflict of value targets, mutual opposition of the different value subjects and the value conflict of the different sports legal systems, which incorporates conflict of value targets, such as freedom and order, equity and freedom, and so on in course of lawmaking, execution of the law, abidance. There are many reasons that lead to the conflict of value of sports law, among which the main reasons are pluralism of subject, mechanical thought model of binary opposition in epistemology, unary and multivariate opposition in axiology, different demand on sports law in different social field. Conflict settlement of value of sports law is demand of value realization of sports law and the incessant renovation and development, so we must solve the conflict of value of sports law by sticking to principles of human - oriented, relative rank and multivariate application.
分 类 号:D912.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145