二战后中日结盟观比较研究——以中苏同盟、日美同盟为例  

The Different Alliance Concept between China and Japan after the Second World War:A Case Study of Sino-USSR Alliance and Japan-USA Alliance

作　　者：张景全[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学政治学博士后流动站 [2]吉林大学东北亚研究院

出　　处：《东北亚论坛》2012年第4期10-15,共6页Northeast Asia Forum

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金"军事同盟与区域合作关系研究"(20100481066);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"日美;韩美同盟与东北亚区域合作的关系"(12JJD810025);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"东北亚地缘政治新动向与中国的战略选择"(10JJDGJW005);吉林大学基本科研业务费资助项目"日美;韩美同盟新变化对东北亚区域合作的影响及我国对策研究"(450060444232);吉林大学基本科研业务费资助项目"朝鲜半岛形势追踪与东北亚地区安全"(2009TD002)

摘　　要：战后中日结盟观存在差异。从结盟功能来看,中国谋求的是生存与安全;日本谋求的是从生存、安全到对外权力的增加、对国际秩序的影响。从结盟对象来看,中国的结盟对象包括强国和相对弱势的国家;日本的结盟对象集中在强国。从同盟地位与同盟管理来看,中国强调地位及管理的平等,而日本对这方面的不平等往往持容忍的态度。从结盟基础来看,中国从以面临共同威胁而产生的共同安全利益以及意识形态划界,到淡化、放弃意识形态划界。日本则从以面临共同威胁而产生的共同安全利益以及意识形态划界,到淡化意识形态,再到一度逐渐强化意识形态划界。从结盟影响来看,中国经历了结盟利于和平到不利于和平的观念转变,日本则以结盟利于和平的观念为主。There are some differences between Chinag and Japang alliance concept after the Second World War. From the view of alliance function, China pursues the survival and security; Japan pursues from the survival and security to the increase of ex- ternal powers and the influence on international order. From the view of alliance object, China＇s alliance object includes the strong and the weak states ; Japans alliance object includes the strong state only. From the view of alliance status and manage- ment, China emphasizes the equality; Japan has patient attitude to inequality usually. From the view of alliance base, China has undergone the change from common security interest because of facing common threat and common ideology to abandon delimit on ideology; Japan has the attitude to delimitation depend on ideology until now. From the view of alliance influence, Chinag concept has undergone from alliance is good for peace to it is harmful to peace; Japan has the concept of alliance is good for peace mainly till now.

关 键 词：中国 日本 结盟观 结盟功能 结盟对象 结盟管理 结盟基础 

分 类 号：F061.5[经济管理—政治经济学]