检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]厦门大学管理学院
出 处:《投资研究》2012年第5期98-113,共16页Review of Investment Studies
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71072053);福建省社会科学重点项目(2010A012);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2010221021);厦门大学基础创新科研基金(201122G014)的资助
摘 要:本文揭示了政治联系这一非正式的制度安排对中国上市公司R&D投资行为的影响。手工搜集了2004-2009年R&D与关键高管政治联系的经验数据,本文实证研究了政治联系是否对R&D具有"挤出"效应。结果表明,政治联系的公司投资于R&D的概率显著更小、R&D投资强度显著更低,即政治联系对R&D投资具有显著的挤出效应。进一步研究发现,相对于非国有上市公司与非高科技企业,政治联系对国有上市公司与高科技上市公司的R&D投资产生了显著的挤出效应。This paper investigates the effects of political connections as an informal institution on R&D investment behavior of Chinese listed firms. Using a hand-collected sample including R&D data and political connections data of key top managers of listed finns from 2004-2009, this paper empirically studies whether and how political connections of key top managers curb R&D investment of Chinese listed firms. The results show that politically connected firms have a significantly lower probability of investing on R&D, and significantly less intensity of R&D investment, suggesting that political connections do curb significantly R&D investment. Furthermore, compared to non-state-owned listed firms, political connections curb significantly R&D investment of state-owned listed firms, and political connections only curb significantly R&D investment of high-tech listed firms, compared to non-high-tech listed firms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.147.70