两种造影剂推注方法在子宫输卵管造影检查中的应用比较  

Application and comparison of two kinds of injection methods of contrast agent for hysterosalpingography

作　　者：马小琴[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东省济宁市市中区妇幼保健院妇产科,272000

出　　处：《中国妇幼保健》2012年第21期3348-3350,共3页Maternal and Child Health Care of China

摘　　要：目的:比较SJ-1宫腔输卵管注液仪注射法与手工推注法在子宫输卵管造影中的应用价值。方法:将2010年1月～2011年1月就诊且行子宫输卵管造影的300例不孕症患者按造影剂推注方法不同进行分组,试验组150例,采用SJ-1宫腔输卵管注液仪推注造影剂,设置注射速度为5 ml/min,20 min后观察造影剂在盆腔的弥散情况。对照组150例,采用人工推注造影剂。采用χ2检验比较两组间的差异。结果:子宫及输卵管造影结果两组之间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);腹痛发生率试验组与对照组分别为24.7%和82.7%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:应用SJ-1宫腔输卵管注液仪推注造影剂行子宫输卵管造影是一种值得推广的检查方法。Objective： To compare the application values of SJ - 1 uterine cavity oviduct injection instrument and manual infection method for hysterosalpingography （HSG） . Methods： A total of 300 infertile patients who underwent HSG in the hospital from January 2010 to January 2011 were divided into different groups according to different injection methods of contrast agent, 150 patients in experimental group adopted SJ - 1 uterine cavity oviduct injection instrument, the velocity of injection was designed at 5 ml per minute, the diffusion of contrast agent in pelvic cavity was observed after 20 minutes; 150 patients in control group adopted manual infection method. Chi -square test was used to compare the difference between the two groups. Results ： There was no statistically significant difference in the result of HSG between the two groups （P 〉0. 05） . The incidences of abdominal pain in experimental group and control group were 24. 7% and 82. 7% , respectively, there was statistically significant difference between the two groups （P 〈 0. 01 ） . Conclusion： As an examination method for HSG, SJ- 1 uterine cavity oviduct injection instrument for contrast agent injection is worth popularizing.

关 键 词：造影剂 注液仪 子宫输卵管造影 

分 类 号：R445[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]