检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《成都医学院学报》2012年第2期331-332,共2页Journal of Chengdu Medical College
摘 要:目的探讨小儿危重病护理评分法对于小儿护理的干预指导意义。方法采用APACHEⅡ评分系统回顾分析我院400例小儿危重病患者预后与并发症情况。结果经过观察,APACHEⅡ不同分数段危重病患儿病死率与并发症发生率比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。APACHEⅡ分值≤10分时,病死率与并发症发生率相对较低;APACHEⅡ分值>10分时,病死率与并发症发生率随着分值的增加而增加,其中APACHEⅡ分值>30分时,并发症发生率高达100%。结论 APACHEⅡ评分能较好地评估急诊危重病患儿病情的严重程度,医护人员可以应用APACHEⅡ评分尽早了解小儿危重病的预后程度并早期实施救治干预。Objective To investigate the guide significance of pediatric critical illness score for pediatric nursing intervention. Methods The APACHE Ⅱ score system was used to retrospectively analysis 400 cases of pediatric critical illness with prognosis and complications. Results APACHE Ⅱ scores with different segments of complications and mortality were statistically significant(P〈0.05). When APACHE Ⅱ score≤10, the mortality and complication rate were relatively low. When APACHE Ⅱ score 〉 10, the mortality and complication rate were increased with the score. In which, when APACHE Ⅱ score〉 30, the complication rate was 100%. Conclusions APACHE Ⅱ score can better assess the critically ill child emergency severity. Clinical staff can use the APACHE Ⅱ score as soon as possible to understand the severity of critical illness and the implementation of early treatment intervention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74