检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄丽萍[1] 王志力[1] 王庆涛[1] 王树祥[1] 陈娟[1] 李红开
出 处:《医学理论与实践》2012年第14期1690-1691,1695,共3页The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice
摘 要:目的:探讨静脉留置针行持续臂丛神经阻滞镇痛(CPNA)在上肢手术术后疼痛的临床疗效及经验总结。方法:将我院麻醉科2011年3-5月收治的38例行上肢手术且接受术后镇痛的患者随机分为CPNA组(持续臂丛神经阻滞镇痛)与PCSA组(皮下自控镇痛)。CPNA组采用静脉留置针于肌间沟穿刺,予以持续臂丛神经阻滞镇痛;PCSA组患者采用皮下注射舒芬太尼自控镇痛。手术结束后4、12、24、48h行静态和动态疼痛视觉模拟评分(VASr、VASm),同时观察不良反应。结果:术后4个时间点CPNA组VAS评分明显低于PCSA组,术后不良反应发生率低于PCSA组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:上肢手术后持续臂丛神经阻滞镇痛(CPNA)效果满意,不良反应发生率低,适于临床应用。Objective:To study the clinical effects and the skills summary of continuous perineural block analgesia(CPNA) through a perivasculer catheter after the upper limb surgery analgesia. Methods: Randomly divide the 38 patients into group CPNA and group PCSA(patient-controlled subcutaneous analgesia), who had received upper limb surgeries and the patient controlled analgesia from March 2011 to May in our anesthesia department. Patients in group CPNA were placed vein-indwelling needles at interscalene sulcus and received PCA at postoperatiorL Patients in group PCSA were received patient-controlled subcutaneous analgesia with sufentanil. Visual analogue scales rest (VASt) ,visual ana-logue scales move(VASm) and the adverse effects were observed at 4,12,24,48 hours after surgery. Results: VAS of group CPNA is far lower than group PCSA at the 4 time points after surgery, and the occurring frequency of adverse effects is lower as well. All differences have statistical significance (P〈0.05). Conclusion: CPNA after upper limb surgery is quite satisfactory with lower occurring frequency of untoward effect. So,it is adaptable to clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3