免疫散射比浊法和免疫透射比浊法测定免疫球蛋白结果比较  

Comparison of determination of serum immunoglobulin between transmission turbidity and scatter turbidity method

作　　者：刘少华 邓文平[1] 李燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆市涪陵中心医院检验科,408000

出　　处：《重庆医学》2012年第20期2034-2035,共2页Chongqing medicine

摘　　要：目的探讨免疫透射比浊法和免疫散射比浊法测定免疫球蛋白(Ig)水平的关系。方法用免疫透射比浊法和免疫散射比浊法检测252例健康体检人群的血清Ig,同时测定IgG高、低值水平,分析两种方法测定结果之间的关系。结果健康体检人群中血清IgG水平免疫透射比浊法[(11.46±4.92)g/L]测定与免疫散射比浊法[(11.85±3.72)g/L]测定相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);免疫透射比浊法IgM[(1.51±1.06)g/L],免疫散射比浊法IgM[(1.60±0.91)g/L]和免疫透射比浊法IgA[(2.08±1.51)g/L],免疫散射比浊法IgA[(2.15±1.19)g/L]水平差异均无统计学意义(P>0.01)。高、低值IgG用两种方法均可以测定。结论了解免疫功能水平时,测定Ig用免疫透射比浊法和免疫散射比浊法均可,但免疫散射比浊法更有利于病情的监测。Objective To compare transmission turbidity and scatter turbidity method on measuration of serum immunoglobulin（Ig） levels.Methods Serum Ig concentration was measured by transmission turbidity and scatter turbidity method in 252 healthy people.The high level and low level of IgG were also measured.The relationship between the two methods was analyzed.Results The results showed that the levels of IgG[（11.46±4.92）g/L,（11.85±3.72）g/L],IgM[（1.51±1.06）g/L,（1.60±0.91）g/L] and IgA [（2.08±1.51）g/L,（2.15±1.19）g/L] had no significant difference in healthy people（P〉0.05） measured by transmission turbidity and scatter turbidity method.High and low level of IgG can detect by transmission turbidity and scatter turbidity method.Conclusion Transmission turbidity and scatter turbidity method can both be used for determination of IgG,while immune scatter turbidity method could be beneficial for evaluation of the disease condition.

关 键 词：散射测浊法和比浊法 免疫球蛋白 

分 类 号：R446.6[医药卫生—诊断学]