检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南理工大学工商管理学院,广东广州510641
出 处:《工业工程》2012年第3期69-74,共6页Industrial Engineering Journal
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(50675069);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2011ZM0036)
摘 要:针对不同生产资源组织模式的结构与运行状态的差异,目前尚缺乏系统的定量评价方法。基于信息熵理论及有序度定义,建立了结构熵模型与运行熵模型来分别评价生产资源组织模式在结构上和运行中的有序度。其中,结构熵模型包括时效熵和质量熵两部分;运行熵模型包括静态运行熵和动态运行熵两部分。对某压缩机制造企业的加工车间做了实例研究,以实施动态单元组织模式前后的结构与运行状态作对比分析,分别求解出2种不同模式下的结构熵与运行熵。结果表明,动态单元组织模式通过合理规划人力、设备资源及生产流程,能够极大减少企业生产中零件的转运与设备空闲时间,具有更优的结构有序度和运行有序度,能获得更好的零件加工效率。Up to now, there is no systematical quantitative method to evaluate the structural and operation- al effectiveness of different manufacturing resource organization modes. Based on the concept of order de- gree and the principle of the information entropy, for different manufacturing resource organization modes, structural and operational entropy models are developed to evaluate the order degree of structure and opera- tion, respectively. The structural entropy model presents both the time effect entropy and the quality entro- py, while the operational entropy model covers both the static and dynamic operational entropy. A case study is given to test the method. By using the proposed method, it evaluates the structural and operational effectiveness for a manufacturing workshop under two organization modes: before anti after the implementa- tion of a dynamic cellular organization. Results show that, by reasonable planning and scheduling of the system, the dynamic cellular organization mode can enormously reduce material delivery requirements and equipment idle time. Thus, it has high order degree and high productivity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.34