检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蓝晓文[1] 廖永强[1] 李荣胜[1] 韩琪[1] 黄韵枝[1] 毛丽君[1] 蔡友娟[1]
机构地区:[1]广东省东莞市人民医院麻醉科,广东东莞523059
出 处:《临床医学工程》2012年第7期1150-1151,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
摘 要:目的比较硬膜外吗啡复合局麻药和静脉布托啡诺用于剖宫产术后的镇痛效果及不良反应。方法回顾分析本院产科2011年9月至2011年12月行剖宫产、术后以硬膜外吗啡复合液(E组)或静脉布托啡诺(I组)镇痛的产妇共503例。记录镇痛效果和相关不良反应。结果 E组95.9%和I组97.4%的产妇术后镇痛效果优良(P>0.05),E组恶心呕吐、瘙痒、下肢麻木等发生率显著高于I组(P<0.01或P<0.05),但I组头晕嗜睡者比E组多(P>0.05)。结论静脉布托啡诺可为剖宫产术后提供满意的镇痛效果,与硬膜外吗啡复合局麻药相比,恶心呕吐及瘙痒等不良反应较少,但头晕嗜睡者较多。Objective To compare the efficacy of intravenous butorphanol and epidural morphine plus ropivacaine in postoperative analgesia after cesarean section.Methods 503 patients with postcesarean analgesia were divided into group E(postoperative epidural analgesia with ropivacaine combined with morphine) and group I(postoperative analgesia with intravenous 8 mg butorphanol).The analgesia effect and related adverse reactions were recorded.Results The excellent and good rate of analgesia was 95.9% and 97.4% in group E and group I respectively(P 0.05).The incidence of nausea and vomiting,pruritus,lower extremities numbness in group E was higher than those in group I(P 0.01 or 0.05),but group I had more cases of dizziness and lethargy(P 0.05).Conclusions Intravenous butorphanol can provide satisfactory postcesarean analgesic effect.Compared with epidural morphine combined with local anesthetics,it has fewer adverse effects such as PONV,pruritus and numbness on lower extremities,but more incidences of dizziness and lethargy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33