检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:侯昌丽[1]
出 处:《西伯利亚研究》2012年第3期46-49,共4页Siberian Studies
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(10YJA740125)
摘 要:独立后,乌克兰历届政府均实施了"去俄罗斯化"语言政策,主要表现在通过语言立法降低俄语地位、缩小俄语使用范围以及改造乌语等方面。究其原因,乌当局将打压俄语作为矫正历史上语言强权的工具、缓解国家认同危机的途径以及乌俄关系中外交博弈的手段。由于乌境内俄语居民众多、俄语地位在乌俄关系中扮演重要角色、语言政策受到国际组织监察等因素的影响,乌克兰未来语言政策的去俄罗斯化将不会有更大的发展空间。After its independence, Ukrainian successive governments all carried out the language policy of de - russification, which is mainly represented in lowering Russian position, narrowing Russian usage scope and reformilag Ukrainian, etc. investi- gating its reason, Ukrainian authorities suppress Russian to be a tool to correct the language superpower in history, to be a way to alleviate the national identity crisis and to be a means to conduct the diplomatic game between Ukraine and Russia. But Ukrainian future language policy of de -russification will not have more potential development scope owing to various influences, which con- sist of a multitude of Russian residents, a key role of Russian position in Ukrainian - Russian relations and international supervi- sion to the language policy and so on.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28