检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:惠威[1] 郭新会[1] 严艳 修冰水[3] 张贺秋[3] 李卓
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院肝病内分泌科,100069 [2]北京市肝病研究所 [3]军事医学科学院基础医学研究所
出 处:《中华检验医学杂志》2012年第7期630-633,共4页Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基 金:国家艾滋病和病毒性肝炎等重大传染病防治科技重大专项资助项目(2008ZX10002-013)
摘 要:目的探讨慢性丙型肝炎患者血清第一高变区(HVR1)抗体的交叉反应性与抗病毒治疗早期病毒应答(EVR)的关系。方法用ELISA丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)HVR1抗体交叉反应性矩阵试剂检测抗HCV高变区抗体差异性,16条高变区抗原与患者血清交叉反应性比较采用Fisher精确概率检验。同时对2009年1月至12月首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院46例慢性丙型肝炎患者抗病毒治疗前基线血清标本进行分析。用荧光定量逆转录(RT).PCR检测46例患者在治疗前、聚乙二醇干扰素联合利巴韦林治疗12周、48周的血清HCVRNA水平,并进行基因分型。结果46例慢性丙型肝炎患者中,HCV2a型16例,1b型30例;治疗12周及结束时分别检测HCVRNA,其中,EVR组33例,非EVR组13例;2a型EVR发生率[93.8%(15/16)]高于1b型[60.0%(18/30),x2=4.316,P〈0.05]。HCV1b型慢性丙型肝炎患者中,EVR组平均多靶点HVR1抗原阳性反应数目为(12±4)个,明显高于非EVR组[(74-5)个,t=2.797,P〈0.01]。经Fisher精确概率法检验,HVR1抗原编号分别为001、003、009、013、016的5条抗原在EVR组患者基线血清的反应阳性率明显高于非EVR组(P均〈0.05)。结论HVR1抗体的交叉反应性可能是一项抗病毒治疗疗效的预测指标。Objective To discuss the relationship between the cross-reactivity of antibody against the hypervariable region 1 ( HVR1 ) of hepatitis C virus and early viral response ( EVR ) in patients undergoing antiviral therapy. Methods By ELISA and HCV HVR1 antibody cross-reactivity matrix reagent, the differences of anti-HCV hypervariable region antibody were tested in baseline serum from 46 patients with chronic hepatitis C before antiviral therapy. HCV genotyping and HCV RNA were analyzed by RT-PCR method. The HCV RNA assay was done at three time points: before treatment, pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin therapy for 12 and 48 weeks. Results In 46 cases of chronic hepatitis C patients, there were 16 cases with HCV 2a type, 30 cases with lb and 33 patients obtained EVR. The EVR incidence of type 2a [ 93.8% (15/16) ] was higher than that of type 1 b[60. 0% (18/30) ,X2 = 4. 316,P 〈 0. 05 ]. In the EVR group of type lb chronic hepatitis C patients, the positive number of average multi-target HVR1 antigen was (12 ± 4), which was significantly higher than that in the Non-EVR patients [ (7 ± 5 ), t = 2. 797, P 〈 0. 011- By the Fisher exact test, it was showed that patients'semm response to HVR1 antigens numbered 001, 003, 009, 013, 016 were higher in EVR group than those in non-EVR group, with statistically significant ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion The cross-reactivity of HVR1 antibody may play an important role in predicting the effectiveness of antiviral therapy. (Chin J Lab Med,2012,35:630-633)
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147