检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《法学杂志》2012年第8期6-14,共9页Law Science Magazine
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目"中国特色人权发展道路研究"(项目编号:11AZD044)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:中国传统社会未将自由与权利概念化并不意味着中国古人无自由与权利。中国传统法律制度在整体上应当被改造、被置换,但并不意味着古人积累的技术智慧与程序艺术不可被承继,更不意味着支撑法文化传统的基于人性又反映中国文化特质的原则可以被抛弃。中国文化传统仍然是我们探讨中国现代法治的逻辑起点。The reason that rule of law had not developed in traditional China's societies is not without freedom, but because Chinese people's traditional way of life did not need it. Chinese traditional legal system should be transformed and be replaced as a whole. However, the principle of meeting the basic needs of humans and the in- telligence & technology of ancestors' social governance should be inherited. Furthermore, as the prop of the tradi- tional legal system, Chinese traditional culture is still the logical starting point from which we explore the modern rule of law in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117