检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:向延平[1]
出 处:《湖南农业科学》2012年第7期131-133,共3页Hunan Agricultural Sciences
基 金:国家社科基金资助项目(07XJY032);湖南省中国少数民族经济省级重点学科资助项目;吉首大学学成返校博士科研资助项目(jsdxkyzz201015)
摘 要:采用模糊分析法对地处湘鄂渝黔的怀化市、湘西州、张家界市、恩施州、铜仁和黔江6个市州的旅游扶贫生态绩效进行了模糊分析,结果表明:6个地区的旅游扶贫生态绩效模糊评价所占比重分别为27%、27.63%、29.84%、27.33%、26.69%、26.79%,其中旅游扶贫生态绩效最为显著的是张家界市,其余依次是湘西州、恩施州、怀化市、黔江地区,最不显著的是铜仁地区。Taking cases of the Huaihua City, Xiangxi Autonomous Prefecture, Zhangjiajie City, Enshi Autonomous Prefecture, Tongren Areas and Qianjiang Areas located in Hunan, Hubei, Chongqing and Guizhou, the ecological performance of helping the poor by tourism by fuzzy analysis method was studied. The results showed that the proportion of the fuzzy evaluation on the ecological performance of helping the poor by tourism was 27%, 27.63%, 29.84%, 27.33%, 26.69% and 26.79%, respectively. The area with the most significant ecological performance of helping the poor by tourism was Zhangjiajie City. And the others were Xiangxi Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi Autonomous Prefecture, Huaihua City, Qianjiang Areas successively. The area with the least significant ecological performance of helping the poor by tourism was Tongren Areas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.153.108