检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《现代医药卫生》2012年第13期1980-1981,共2页Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
摘 要:目的探讨护理干预在高频电波(LEEP)刀治疗宫颈病变的临床意义。方法将180例宫颈病变患者随机分为干预组90例,常规组90例,常规组按平时LEEP刀治疗进行常规护理,干预组在常规组的基础上实施常规护理干预措施,包括疾病相关知识宣教、心理护理、术中干预、专科护理、术后健康教育,并于术后记录手术所需的时间、出血量、疗效。结果干预组一次治愈率为97%,且术中所需时间、出血量明显少于常规组,两组比较其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论实施有效的护理干预不仅能减轻患者的术前焦虑,还可提高LEEP刀治疗宫颈糜烂的疗效,减少手术时间和出血量。Objective To explore the clinical significance of nursing interventions in the treatment of cervical lesion with LEEP knife. Methods 180 patients with cervical lesion were randomly divided into the intervention group(90 cases) and the conventional group(90 cases). Routine care was provided to the conventional group. Based on the implementation of rou- tine care in the interventional group, the interventional measures were implemented including disease-related knowledge propa- ganda and education,psychological care,intraoperative interventions,specialist care ,postoperative health education. The time required for surgery, blood loss and effects were recorded after operation. Results The once cure rate in the intervention group was 97%, and the operative time and bleeding volume were significantly less than those in the conventional group, showing sta- tistical difference between the two groups (P〈0.05). Conclusion Implementing the effective nursing interventions can not only reduce the patient's preoperative anxiety,but also improve the efficacy of LEEP knife for treating cervical erosion, reduce op- erative time and blood loss.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31