民族精神须有理性基础——以黑格尔对历史法学派的批判为分析视角  

Rationality:A Must of National Spirit——In Perspective of Hegel’s critique of the Historical Law School

作　　者：李育书[1] 

机构地区：[1]中共上海市委党校哲学教研部,上海200233

出　　处：《武陵学刊》2012年第4期35-40,共6页Journal of Wuling

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目:"美国马克思主义流派史--以哲学为视角"(12YJC720052)

摘　　要：黑格尔认为,法的基础是理性,在此意义上,黑格尔对历史法学派提出了批判,认为其"民族精神"无法体现普遍理性,孤立的历史事实背后实际上仍是理性精神在起作用。在黑格尔法哲学中,理性一方面具有普遍性,另一方面意味着自由;普遍理性并不否定个体自由。正确理解普遍理性与民族传统的关系,对于正确看待当前关于"中国模式"的理论争论有深刻的启示。Hegel believes that the base of law is rationality. He criticizes historical law school and believes that its ＂national spirit＂ can not reflect universal rationality. In fact, behind isolated historical facts works rational spirit. In Hegel＇ s Philosophy of Law, rationality on one hand is universal; on the other hand, it means freedom. Universal ratio- nality does not deny individual freedom. Proper understanding of the relationship between universal rationality and national tradition is of great significance to settle the disputation on ＂China model＂.

关 键 词：黑格尔 历史法学派 法哲学 理性 民族精神 

分 类 号：D909.516[政治法律—法学理论] B516.35[政治法律—法学]