我国农村环保社区自组织的模式选择  

The Mode Selection of Community Self-organization in China's Rural Environmental Protection

作　　者：宋言奇[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学社会学院,江苏苏州215213

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第4期51-55,共5页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(07CSH005)

摘　　要：我国传统农村环保社区自组织沿袭的是社会资本型模式,不同于奥斯特罗姆在《公共事务治理之道》中描述的制度资本型模式。当前我国社会资本型农村环保社区自组织模式已经受到很大冲击,难以为继。在未来的农村环保社区自组织中,我们应当选择一条制度资本与社会资本并重而且相互促进的模式:利用制度资本促进社会网络的拓展,同时利用社会资本推进制度资本的增值。The community self-organization of China＇s traditional rural environmental protection inherited the social capital mode. This mode was different from the Institutional capital mode which was described by Ostrom in Governing the commons： The Evolution of Institution for collective Action. At current, the social capital mode of community self-organization in China＇s rural environmental pro- tection has been impacted significantly, and is almost unsustainable. So in the future＇s community self-organization of rural environmental protection, we should choose a mode which both institutional capital mode and social capital mode, and they benefit from each other reciprocally.

关 键 词：农村社区 环保 自组织 模式选择 

分 类 号：D669.3[政治法律—政治学]