检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈凯[1] 孙海角 何连华[1] 符龙彪[1] 武林[1]
机构地区:[1]中国建筑科学研究院风工程研究中心,北京100013 [2]华润(大连)有限公司,大连116001
出 处:《建筑结构》2012年第7期123-127,共5页Building Structure
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(50878202)
摘 要:结合某高层建筑表面风压的试验测量,分别用峰值因子法和概率分析方法计算了建筑表面风压极值,对两种方法获得的结果进行了详细对比分析。证实对大多数区域而言,这两种方法可以获得大体相当的结果,但在局部区域存在较大差异,而这些区域恰恰是应当引起关注的风压较高的区域。通过分析差异产生的原因,总结出对于负压区域,由于各种流动现象造成压力脉动远远偏离高斯分布,使得峰值因子法失效,而本文给出的概率分析方法与概率分布形式无关,简便易行。The extreme wind pressures acting on a high-rise building were obtained through peak factor method and probability distribution analysis.The comparison was carried out subsequently and it was concluded that the results were approximately equal except in some local regions.However,the wind pressure was relatively high in those local regions which should be focused on.The reason leading to the difference was that the pressure fluctuation in the flow separation region was significantly different from the Gaussian distribution and consequently invalidated the peak factor method.However,the probability distribution analysis used in the present work was independent of the probability distribution and easy to follow.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.141.114