诉讼外和解协议的生效与解除——对最高人民法院《指导案例2号》的实体法解释  

Litigation Settlement Agreement’s Entry-into-force and Discharging: the Substantive Legal Interpretation of Guidance Case II by the Supreme People’s Court

作　　者：隋彭生[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院

出　　处：《中国政法大学学报》2012年第4期73-79,160,共7页Journal Of CUPL

摘　　要：上诉期间当事人达成的诉讼外和解协议为附生效条件的合同。该生效条件为混合条件。对和解协议的解除有三种解释:第一种解释是"附随意解除条件";第二种解释是"附解除权";第三种解释是"一方重大违约而另一方解除合同"。和解协议解除之后,可申请执行原判决。The settlement agreement achieved during the appeal proceedings is a contract attaching the entry-into-force conditions. The entry-into-force conditions are the mixed conditions. There are three explanations for the discharging conditions of settlement agreement: The first explanation is arbitrary conditions; The second explanation is right to discharging; The third explanation is one party to make a major breach. After discharging, the parties may apply for the implementation of the original judgment.

关 键 词：和解协议 附生效条件 附解除条件 附解除权 重大违约 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]