检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈群英[1]
机构地区:[1]四川省林业中心医院儿科,四川成都610081
出 处:《中国医药指南》2012年第19期83-84,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的对比评价雾化吸入沙丁胺醇、地塞米松对喘息型支气管炎患儿的临床疗效。方法 96例喘息型支气管炎患儿随机分为A组(n=48)和B组(n=48),给予A组患儿沙丁胺醇雾化吸入治疗,B组患儿接受地塞米松雾化吸入治疗,对比两组治疗效果。结果 A组总有效率95.8%(46/48),B组总有效率81.3%(39/48),两组有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论沙丁胺醇雾化吸入治疗小儿喘息型支气管炎效果显著、安全。Objective To compare the clinical effects of albuterol and dexamethason on the treatment of infant asthmatic bronchitis by inhalation. Method 96 infant asthmatic bronchitis were divided into the A group (n=48) and the B group (n=48) . The A group took albuterol inhalation while the B group took dexamethason inhalation. The clinical effects were measured. Results The total effective rate of the A group was 95.8% and 81.3% of the B group. There was significant different betweeia the two group (P〈0.05) . Conclusion Dexamethason has obvious benefit on the treatment of infant asthmatic bronchitis by inhalation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222