基于关系原则的古籍命名方式考论——以《汉书·艺文志》为例  

Research on Naming Modes of Ancient Books Based on Relation Principle:Taking Han Dynasty·Yiwen Recordsas an Example

作　　者：傅荣贤[1] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学信息资源管理研究中心,哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《大学图书馆学报》2012年第4期87-91,125,共6页Journal of Academic Libraries

基　　金：黑龙江省教育厅人文社会科学项目一般项目"<汉书.艺文志>研究中的两个基本路向及其得失"成果之一

摘　　要：《汉书·艺文志》通过分类目录,将众多文献厘定为各种关系存在。没有脱离其他相关文献而独立存在的孤立文献,相应地,基于独立文献个体特征的命名并不能作为文献名称基本与否的标准,基于类别关系的命名比基于单个文献的命名更为基本。"关系"强调同质化,由同质化导致的古籍书名既有可能因精于求同而更为深刻地揭示出古籍的内容性质,也有可能因疏于别异而泯灭古籍的个性内涵。Han Dynasty · Yiwen Records redefines literatures as various relation being with classified catalogue. There is no literature which exists isolately from other literatures. Accordingly naming based on individual characteristics of literature cannot be treated as the standards of literature titles. Therefore, na- ming on cataloge relationship is more fundamental than the one based on single literature. ＂Relationship＂ emphasizes homogenization which might make the ancient book titles not only reveal the character of con- tent more profoundly but also perish the character connotation due to the ignorece of differences.

关 键 词：古籍 书名 关系 《汉书·艺文志》 

分 类 号：G257.35[文化科学—图书馆学]