论我国专利权评价报告制度--一起专利侵权案件引发的思考  

On Chinese Evaluation Report System of Patent: Thinking over a Patent Infringement Case

作　　者：沈世娟[1] 薛宁[2] 

机构地区：[1]常州大学 [2]常州大学法律系

出　　处：《知识产权》2012年第7期80-84,共5页Intellectual Property

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究自筹经费项目:项目批准号:12YJE820001

摘　　要：专利权评价报告制度是专利初步审查制度的有效补充,但由于制度设计的缺陷,没有发挥应有的作用。通过放宽评价报告申请人资格、规范评价报告公开方式,可以制约权利人滥用专利权。人民法院对涉及实用新型和外观设计专利临时救济措施的采取,应当要求权利人提交评价报告,并赋予被控侵权人程序性权利,法官对证据的采信应基于要解决的技术问题、技术方案和技术效果的综合分析、比对,才能体现专利侵权案件中评价报告的证据属性。The evaluation report system of patent is an effective supplement of the patent preliminary examination system. But it has not played its role because of its design defect. It can restrict the abuse of patent by loosening the qualification of evaluation report applicant and standardizing the disclosure model of evaluation report. When a court takes a temporary relief measures related to utility model or design, the court shall request the patentee to provide an evaluation report, and give the infringer procedural rights. A judge shall be on the comprehensive analysis of the technical problem to be solved, technical solution and technical effects when he adopts evidence, so the evidence attribute of evaluation report can be embodied.

关 键 词：评价报告 公开 临时救济措施 证明力 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]