岳麓书院秦简三年《质日》初探  

An Exploration about the Three Zhi Risi on Qin Bamboo Slips Stored in Yue Lu Academy

作　　者：斯琴毕力格 罗见今[1] 

机构地区：[1]内蒙古师范大学科学技术史研究院,内蒙古呼和浩特010022

出　　处：《内蒙古师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2012年第3期146-149,共4页Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家自然科学基金"<崇祯历书>中的‘法’与‘数’及其在中国的嬗变"(10863001)研究成果之一

摘　　要：笔者根据《岳麓书院藏秦简.壹》中《廿七年质日》、《卅四年质日》、《卅五年私质日》,论述其形制、内容、笔误和共同特点,与里耶秦简、周家台秦简等相关记录做了比较。经过总结其共性,结合较有代表性的汉代历谱简册,与里耶秦简、周家台三十号秦墓竹简比对后,就秦汉历谱简册形制、避秦始皇名讳、未注气、非实用历谱等问题做了初步探讨。我们认为,《岳麓书院秦简.壹》三年《质日》既非实用历谱,亦非日记,而是带有历谱格式的官员纪事册。Based on Zhi Ri in the Year of 27, Zhi Ri in the Year of 34 and Zhi Ri in the Year of 35 in Qin Bamboo Slips Stored in Yue Lu Academy, I, the author discusses their structure, contents, slips of the pen and common features, and makes a comparison with the corresponding records on Qin bamboo slips of Liye and Zhoujiatai. Summarizing their common features, studying them together with the simpli- fied representative calendars in the Han Dynasty and comparing them with Qin bamboo slips of Liye and those dug out in No. 30 Tomb of Zhoujiatai, the author makes an exploration about the structure, the a- voidance of the name of the First Emperor, lack of annotations and impractical quality of simplified calen- dars in Qin and Han Dynasty, and thus draws the conclusion that that Zhi Riin those three years in Qin Bamboo Slips Stored in Yue Lu Academy, I are neither practical calendars nor diaries, but official record- ing notebooks in the form of calendars.

关 键 词：中国古代历法 颛顼历 岳麓书院秦简 质日 

分 类 号：K207[历史地理—历史学]