检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高中[1]
出 处:《苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年第4期50-63,191,共14页Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究2012年规划基金项目"形式法治与实质法治二元发展路径研究:以新加坡法律治理模式为切入点"(项目编号:12YJA820017);湖南大学"中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"2011年重点项目"法治的形式与实质二元分离范式研究"的阶段性成果
摘 要:新加坡自1965年建国始以"低补偿"为显著特征的土地征收制度运行了长达四十余载,直至2007年方予重大修改。这些被新加坡国内外诸多人士谴责为"恶法"的征地补偿规则成功运行如此长时间且从未引发野蛮强拆或者被征收人(户)涉法上访、堵路、跳楼、自焚乃至暴力性质的群体性抗法等征地与拆迁乱象。以"法治二元论"视角观之,其根源于新加坡法律治理过程中所依循的泾渭分明的形式法治与实质法治二元发展路径。新加坡土地征收领域的法治实践是该国处于长期执政地位的人民行动党依法执政和全社会服从规则治理事业的缩影。新加坡法治建设模式可为中国等法治后发型国家所学习和借鉴。Since the founding of the Republic of Singapore in 1965,the Land Acquisition Act,with the characteristics of Low Compensation,had been undergone over 40 years,till the fundamental revision of the Act in 2007.The so cursed Evil Law as the Low Compensation Rules had been surprisingly operated well enough and never confronted with judicial decision related grief reports,and other extreme demonstrations such as road-blockings,suicidal burning and collective violence.In the perspective of legal governance,the success is rooted in Singapore mode of dualistic development of Formal Rule of Law and Substantial Rule of Law,which is epitome of PAP's reign in accordance to rule of law and the respect of law of the whole society in the domain of land acquisition.Singapore experience can been drawn on by China and other countries featured by newly launched construction of rule of law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43