检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]甘肃中医学院,甘肃兰州730000 [2]甘肃省中医院 [3]不详
出 处:《西部中医药》2012年第7期87-88,共2页Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察标准旋牵手法治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的临床疗效。方法:将600例符合病例入选标准的椎动脉型颈椎病患者随机分为A、B、C3组,每组200例。A组应用标准旋牵手法治疗;B组应用旋转扳法治疗;C组应用颈椎牵引治疗。3组治疗均1次/周,4次为1个疗程。观察3组患者两侧椎动脉(VA)、基底动脉(BA)的收缩峰期血流速度(Vpeak)、舒张末期血流速度(Vmi n)、搏动指数(PI)、阻力指数(RI)值。结果:总有效率A组为92.00%,B组为83.00%,C组为63.00%。3组总有效率两两比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Vpeak、Vmi n、PI、RI等血流参数治疗前后组内相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗后组间相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:标准旋牵手法治疗椎动脉型颈椎病疗效确切。Objective: To observe clinical effects of normal rotation-traction manipulation in treating vertebral artery type of cervical spondylosis. Method: Six hundred patients were randomly divided into A, B, C groups, 200 cases each group. A group received normal rotation-traction manipulation; B group were given with rotation manipulation; C group were administered with cervical traction. Once each week, one session was four times. VA, V peak ofBA, V rain, PI and RI were observed. Result: Total effective rate of A group was 92.00%, B group 83.00% and C group 63.00%, comparisons among three groups showed statistical meaning(P〈0.05). Comparison within one group before and after treating indicated statistical meaning in V peak, V min, PI, RI and others (P〈0.05). Comparison among three groups manifested statistical meaning (P〈0.05). Conclusion: Normal rotation-traction manipulation is an effective method for vertebral artery type of cervical spondylosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28