检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周柱玉[1,2] 陈亚青[1] 沈理[2] 张海兵[3] 陆殿元[2] 蔡建荣[2]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院超声科,200093 [2]上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院崇明分院超声科 [3]上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院崇明分院放射科,202150
出 处:《重庆医学》2012年第22期2237-2239,共3页Chongqing medicine
摘 要:目的探讨多平面三维超声(3D-US)诊断胃癌及其术前分期的应用价值。方法对70例胃癌患者分别进行二维超声(2D-US)、3D-US及增强CT(CE-CT)检查,并与胃镜及手术病理检查结果进行对照分析。结果 2D-US、3D-US及CE-CT诊断胃癌的准确率分别为81.4%、94.2%、78.5%,三者之间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2D-US、3D-US及CE-CT对胃癌分期诊断符合率分别为86.0%、90.9%、65.5%,三者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。3D-US分期准确率及术前T分期准确率明显高于2D-US及CE-CT。结论 3D-US诊断胃癌及术前分期准确率较高,可以作为胃癌诊断和术前T分期的重要补充检查方法。Objective To explore the value of multi-tomography three-dimensional ultrasonography in diagnosis and pre-operation staging of gastric carcinoma.Methods Two-dimensional ultrasonography(2D-US),three-dimensional ultrasonography(3D-US) and contrast enhanced CT(CE-CT) were performed in 70 cases with gastric carcinomaes,respectively.The imaging results were compared with that of gastric endoscopy and pathology.Results The diagnostic accuracy for 2D-US、3D-US and CE-CT were 81.4%,94.2%,78.5%,respectively.The difference among three groups showed statistically significant(P〈0.05).The accuracy of staging for 2D-US、3D-US and CE-CT were 86.0%,90.9%,65.5%,respectively.There was statistical difference among three groups.The diagnostic and staging accuracy for 3D-US was highest.Conclusion The diagnostic and staging accuracy of 3D-US for gastric carcinoma is high and it plays a complementary role in diagnosing and staging for gastric carcinomas,preoperatively.
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R735.2[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.226.181.89