检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙军红[1] 陆年宏[2] 谭伟龙[2] 贾德胜[2]
机构地区:[1]南京军区联勤部卫生部,江苏南京210016 [2]南京军区疾病预防控制中心,江苏南京210002
出 处:《中华卫生杀虫药械》2012年第4期284-286,共3页Chinese Journal of Hygienic Insecticides and Equipments
摘 要:目的探讨修建和完善防鼠设施对控制鼠密度的重要性。方法对5个农场鼠重点危害场所,检查所有通向室内的门、窗、下水道等8处通道口,有无防鼠设施以及是否完善,并调查2009年以来的鼠密度资料。结果 5个农场除2家在下水道修建防鼠网外,其他通道均未采取有效防鼠设施,重点房间防鼠设施不合格率最高的为37.6%,最低的为21.8%。2009年以来5个农场虽然每年基本上都采取2次大面积药物灭鼠,但鼠密度都存在着灭前高、灭后低的迹象,不能长久维持在较低水平。结论加强防鼠设施建设,提高其防鼠能力是控制室内鼠密度的重要因素。Objective To study the effects of physical rat-proof methods in control of rat's density. Methods Setting up rodents control equipments in eight passageways inside the five farms, for instance the edges of doors, win- dows and sewers etc. The datas of rat density were collected back to the date of 2009. Results Only two of the five farms had set up rodents control equipments in sewers. Fraction defectiveness of the key cubicles ranged from 21.8% to 37.6%. It was difficult for the five farms to keep in low rat density for twice deratization a year in the past four years. Conclusion Physical rat-proof and rat-proof efficacy are the key points for controlling rat and keeping the density of rat in a low level.
分 类 号:R184.35[医药卫生—流行病学] S443[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.147.165