检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊初琴[1] 张蒂荣[1] 陈颐[1] 张晶莉[1] 潘敏[1]
出 处:《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》2012年第13期1741-1742,共2页Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
摘 要:目的探讨经会阴部超声比经腹部超声检查后壁、侧后壁前置胎盘的诊断的准确性。方法回顾性分析60例后壁、侧后壁前置胎盘分别经腹与经会阴超声检查结果对照。结果对后壁、侧后壁完全性与部分性前置胎盘的诊断上述两种方法无明显统计学并差异(P>0.05);对后壁、侧后壁边缘性与低置性前置胎盘的诊断上述两方法有显著差异(P<0.01)。结论经会阴部超声检查对后壁、侧后壁边缘性与低置性前置胎盘的诊断明显优于经腹部超声检查,具有重要的诊断价值。Objective The accuracy of transperineal sonography was investigated in the diagnosis of posterior wall and lateral posterior wall by comparing with transabdominal sonography. Methods The results of of the transperineal and the transabdominal sonography were compared through retrospectively analyzing 60 cases placenta previa of posterior wall and lateral posterior wall. Results There was no significant difference between the two methods in the diagnosis of total placenta previa and partial placenta previa of posterior wall and lateral posterior wall (P 〉 0.05). There was significant difference between the two methods in the diagnosis of lower and marginal placenta previa of posterior wall and lateral poste- rior wall (P 〈 0.01). Conclusions It is obviously clear that transperineal sonography is superior to the transabdominal sonography in the diagnosis of lower and marginal placenta previa of posterior wall and lateral posterior wall.
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175