检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁田[1,2]
机构地区:[1]清华大学法学院 [2]黑龙江大学
出 处:《北方法学》2012年第4期103-112,共10页Northern Legal Science
摘 要:学界通说认为,折中资本制与法定资本制、授权资本制共同构成了公司资本形成制度的三种模式,然而作为一种学说,折中资本制的制度内涵和合理性尚存在可质疑和再讨论的空间。基于对折中资本制的本质研析,对比欧盟与美国公司资本制度建构的不同路径,并从制度移植的角度考察日本及我国台湾地区立法例的晚近发展,探讨资本制度的模式选择问题,从而审视我国现行资本制度的立法规制,以对我国资本制度改革提出建构意见。It is recognized by the academia of China that the formation system of corporate capital in company laws is realized mainly by three modes, namely the statutory capital system, the authoritative capital system, and the eclectic capital system. This paper suggests that the nature and justifiability of the eclectic capital system needs further discussion. Based on analysis of the system nature and comparison of different paths to capital formation in EU and America, as well as the latest development in Japan and Taiwan Region, this paper focuses on path selection of capital formation system, reviews the current capital formation system in our country, and offers tentative suggestions on the reform of the capital formation system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49