《证类本草》版本系统划分依据探讨——兼论《绍兴本草》与《新编类要图注本草》版本系统的归属  

Discussion of evidence for the division of editions of Zhenglei Bencao ——and besides on theallocation of Shaoxing Bencao and Xinbian Leiyao Tuzhu Bencao

作　　者：李健[1] 张卫[1] 梁飞[2] 袁利[3] 刘佳玉[1] 张瑞贤[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国中医科学院中药研究所,北京100700 [2]北京中医药大学,北京100029 [3]江西中医学院,江西南昌330004

出　　处：《中华医史杂志》2012年第4期226-230,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical History

摘　　要：讨论《证类本草》的版本系统，首先应当明确《证类本草》传本与《证类本草》衍生著作之间的区别，即应当明确《证类本草》传本的基本特征：具备序例、药物各论；各药内容包括《本草图经》药图、《嘉=i；占本草》的文本、《本草图经》的文本，以及唐氏增补“余药”内容和唐氏续添证类的部分。以此为据，《绍兴本草》并非《证类本草》传本，而《新编类要图注本草》则属于《证类本草》传本。Before discussion of the editions of Zhenglei Bencao, the relation between the book and its circulating editions （ including the features of those editions） should be investigated. Those circulating editions should include preface and materia mediea systematics. Their contents should include the text and figures from Bencao Tufing, text from Jiayou Bencao and contents added by TANG, According to the features above, it was found that Shaoxing Bencao was not the circulating edition of Zhenglei Bencao while Xinbian Leivao Tuzhu Bencao was.

关 键 词：《证类本草》 《绍兴本草》 《新编类要图注本草》 版本 

分 类 号：R281.3[医药卫生—中药学]