女性主义知识论的政治性研究  

Studying the Political Nature of Feminist Epistemology

作　　者：曹剑波[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学哲学系,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2012年第4期9-15,共7页Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"怀疑与确证"(2010221058);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"实验哲学"(2012221003);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目"实验哲学"(NCET-11-0290);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"对话与语境"(10YJC730001);福建省社科规划项目"马克思主义视野下的宗教对话理论研究"(2012B161)

摘　　要：女性主义知识论不仅为女性主义消除男性中心主义的霸权、结束压迫妇女的社会实践提供了哲学依据,而且为批判与更新西方主流知识论提供了力量之源。为了实现女性主义知识论的政治目的,女性主义知识论对主流的、传统的、"男流的"知识论进行了批判。它从"女性被遗忘"、"与女性相关的知识被忽视"和"女性被伤害"三个方面批判了主流知识论。针对"女性主义知识论政治色彩的理由是否充分"和"女性主义的证据论是否主张政治优先性"问题,主流知识论者提出了质疑,女性主义知识论者给出了有力的回应。Feminist epistemology not only provides the philosophical basis for eliminating the hegemony of androcentrism and ending the social practice of oppressing women, but also provides a source of strength for criticizing and updating the Western mainstream epistemology. In order to achieve the political aim of feminist epistemology, feminist epistemologists criticize the mainstream, traditional, ＂malestream＂ epistemology from three aspects, which are： ＂women are forgotten＂, ＂female-related knowledge is neglected＂ and ＂women are hurt＂. To the mainstream epistemologists＇ challenges of ＂whether the evidence of political nature of feminist epistemology is enough＂ and ＂whether the theory of feminist evidence holds the political priority＂, the feminist epistemologists give strong responses.

关 键 词：女性主义知识论 主流知识论 政治性 

分 类 号：B08[哲学宗教—哲学理论]